Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 978

ORDER granting 975 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 968 MOTION to Compel LOG-IN INFORMATION FOR STAPLESLINK.COM AND EWAY.COM FROM STAPLES INC.; Responses due by 9/20/2011; Replies due by 9/22/2011. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 09/15/11. cc:attys 9-15-11 (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, vs. Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC Defendants. § § § Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED § § § § JURY TRIAL § § § § § § § § § § § § § ORDER GRANTING EOLAS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THE RESPONSE AND REPLY BRIEFS FOR EOLAS’ MOTION TO COMPEL LOG-IN INFORMATION FOR STAPLESLINK.COM AND EWAY.COM FROM STAPLES, INC. The Court, having considered Eolas Technologies Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) Unopposed Motion for Extensions of Time for the Response and Reply Briefs for Eolas’ Motion to Compel Log-In Information for stapleslink.com and eway.com from Staples, Inc. and finding good cause supporting it, finds the Motion should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Staples file any brief in opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion no later than September 20, 2011 and that Plaintiff file any reply brief no later than September 22, 2011. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 15th day of September, 2011. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?