Smith v. Astrue

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING 16 Report and Recommendations. It is ORDERED that the Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 USC 405(g) with instructions for further consideration consistent with the Court's findings. Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 2/22/2012. (leh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION THOMAS SMITH § v. § COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:10-CV-283 § ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this action, has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the action be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with instructions for further consideration of Plaintiff’s evidence submitted after the ALJ’s decision in accordance with this determination and the Fifth Circuit’s reasoning in Hunter v. Astrue, 283 Fed. Appx. 261, 263 & n.7 (5th Cir. 2008) (per curiam), and the cases it cites. No written objections have been filed. The findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are therefore adopted as those of the Court. In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's final decision is hereby REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with instructions for further consideration consistent 1 with the findings above. It is further ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. It is SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 22nd day of February, 2012. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?