Wolf v. Rudd et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 49 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by David Paul Wolf. ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 9/10/2012. (gsg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DAVID PAUL WOLF, #468145
REBECCA RUDD, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:10cv381
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States
Magistrate Judge John D. Love. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed
findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for
consideration. The Report recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry
#49) be denied due to the existence of genuine disputes of material fact. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). No
objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and
conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts same as the findings and conclusions of
the Court. It is therefore
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry #49) is hereby
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 10th day of September, 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?