Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP. et al

Filing 142

Joint MOTION ENTRY OF DISCOVERY ORDER by Uniloc Singapore Private Limited, Uniloc USA, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hill, Jack)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, ET AL. Defendants. UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. DISK DOCTORS LABS, INC., ET AL. Defendants. UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs,   vs. NATIONAL INSTURMENTS COPR., ET AL. Defendants. UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. ENGRASP, INC., ET AL. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:10-CV-373 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § §   CASE NO. 6:10-CV-471 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:10-CV-472 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:10-CV-591 PATENT CASE UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. BMC SOFTWARE, INC., ET AL. Defendants. UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. FOXIT CORPORATION, ET AL. Defendants. SYMANTEC CORPORATION, ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:10-CV-636 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:10-CV-691 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:11-CV-33 PATENT CASE JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DISCOVERY ORDER Pursuant to the Court’s May 20, 2011 Order, Uniloc, Activision, Adobe, Aladdin, BMC, Digital River, EA, Filemaker, Foxit, Freedom Scientific, GeoSpatial, Intego, Intuit, Magix, McAfee, National Instruments, Onyx, Pinnacle, Safenet, Solar Winds, Sonic, Sony, Symantec, Transmagic, and Wildpackets move the Court for entry of the attached Discovery Order. As reflected in the certificate of conference attached hereto, 57 of the 60 defendants in all the related cases have complied with the meet and confer requirements in Local Rule CV-7(h). While not all parties have expressly joined in this motion, no party has expressed opposition to the Discovery Order requested by this motion. By: /s/ Paul J. Hayes (w/permission Wes Hill) Paul J. Hayes – Lead Attorney Dean G. Bostock HAYES, BOSTOCK & CRONIN, LLC 300 Brickstone Square, 9th Floor Andover, MA 01810 (978) 809-3850 (978) 809-3869 (fax) dbostock@hbcllc.com T. John Ward, Jr. Texas State Bar. No. 00794818 J. Wesley Hill Texas State Bar. No. 24032294 WARD & SMITH LAW FIRM 111 West Tyler St. Longview, Texas 75601 Tel: (903) 757-6400 Fax: (903) 757-2323 Email: jw@wsfirm.com E-mail: wh@wsfirm.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I hereby certify that counsel for 57 of the 60 defendants has complied with the meet and confer requirements in Local Rule CV-7(h). This motion is consented to and not opposed by the parties listed below. Some parties have not participated. The Court Issued its Order on May 20, 2011. Uniloc emailed to all defendants a proposed Discovery Offer on May 22, 2011. A group of defendants circulated a counterproposal on May 26th. Seven group telephonic conferences were held May 27, 2011. Counsels for Uniloc and various defendants exchanged numerous emails between May 22, and May 31, 2011. Uniloc circulated modifications on May 30, 2011. A group of defendants responded with additional changes. A final meet and confer was conducted by telephone on May 31, 2011 with counsels for a number of the parties. At the time of filing, twenty-seven (27) parties consented to the Joint Proposed Discovery Order. Parties consenting to the Joint Propose Discovery Order Uniloc entities (2), Activision, Adobe, Aladdin entities (2), BMC, Digital River, EA, Filemaker, Foxit, Freedom Scientific, GeoSpatial, Intego, Intuit, Magix, McAfee, National Instruments, Onyx, Pinnacle, Safenet, Solar Winds, Sonic, Sony, Symantec, Transmagic, Wildpackets /s/ Wesley Hill Wesley Hill CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document through the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on the 31st day of May, 2011. /s/ Wesley Hill Wesley Hill

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?