Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP. et al

Filing 207

NOTICE by Uniloc Singapore Private Limited, Uniloc USA, Inc. of United States Patent Office's Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate for Patent-in-Suit (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Nelson, Edward)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION § § § § § § § § UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. DISK DOCTORS LABS, INC., ET AL. Defendants. UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP., ET AL. Defendants. UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. ENGRASP, INC., ET AL. Defendants. 1 CASE NO. 6:10-CV-472 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, ET AL. Defendants. CASE NO. 6:10-CV-471 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § vs. CASE NO. 6:10-CV-373 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 6:10-CV-591 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § BMC SOFTWARE, INC., ET AL. Defendants. UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. FOXIT CORPORATION, ET AL. Defendants. SYMANTEC CORPORATION, ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Defendants. CASE NO. 6:10-CV-691 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § vs. CASE NO. 6:10-CV-636 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 6:11-CV-33 PATENT CASE PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE EX PARTE REEXAMINATION CERTIFICATE FOR PATENT-IN-SUIT Currently pending before the Court are two motions to stay pending the outcome of reexamination of the patent-in-suit. See Uniloc USA, Inc., et al. v. Disk Doctors Labs, Inc. et al., Case No. 6:10-cv-471 (Dkt. No. 122); Uniloc USA, Inc. et al. v. Engrasp, Inc. et al., Case No. 6:10-cv-591 (Dkt. No. 117). On August 5, 2011, the United States Patent Office issued a Notice 2 of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate in those reexamination proceedings. A copy of the Patent Office’s notice is attached as Exhibit A. As set forth in the notice, the Patent Office has confirmed all claims of the patent-in-suit over the prior art. With the re-examination now concluded, Plaintiffs contend that both motions to stay pending re-examination should be denied as moot. Dated: August 10, 2011 Respectfully Submitted, s/ Edward R. Nelson, III Edward R. Nelson, III Texas State Bar No. 00797142 Barry J. Bumgardner Texas State Bar No. 24041918 Steven W. Hartsell Texas State Bar No. 24040199 S. Brannon Latimer Texas State Bar No. 24060137 Jaime K. Olin Texas State Bar No. 24070363 NELSON BUMGARDNER CASTO, P.C. 3131 West 7th Street, Suite 300 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 (817) 377-9111 (817) 377-3485 (fax) enelson@nbclaw.net barry@nbclaw.net shartsell@nbclaw.net blatimer@nbclaw.net jolin@nbclaw.net T. John Ward, Jr. Texas State Bar No. 00794818 J. Wesley Hill Texas State Bar No. 24032294 WARD & SMITH LAW FIRM 111 West Tyler St. Longview, Texas 75601 Tel: (903) 757-6400 Fax: (903) 757-2323 jw@wsfirm.com wh@wsfirm.com 3 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNILOC USA, INC. AND UNILOC SINGAPORE PRIVATE LIMITED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that on August 10, 2011, the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). /s/ Edward R. Nelson, III Edward R. Nelson, III 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?