Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP. et al

Filing 246

NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Symantec Corp. -- Notice of Compliance with P.R. 4-2 -- (Jones, Michael)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC SINGAPORE PRIVATE LIMITED, Civil Action No. 6:10-CV-472-LED Plaintiffs, v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP. et al., Defendants. SYMANTEC CORPORATION’S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH P.R. 4-2 Defendant Symantec Corporation hereby notifies the Court that it served its P.R. 4-2 disclosures on counsel of record for Plaintiffs Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Singapore Private Limited pursuant to the Docket Control Order [Dkt. No. 150] and paragraph 2 of the Discovery Order [Dkt. No. 147] on August 24, 2011 via electronic mail. Dated: August 29, 2011 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones State Bar No. 10929400 POTTER MINTON A Professional Corporation 110 N. College, Suite 500 (75702) Tyler, Texas 75702 (903) 597-8311 (903) 593-0846 (Facsimile) mikejones@potterminton.com {A07/7643/0005/W0483922.1 } LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Mark A. Flagel Yury Kapgan Dale Chang 355 S. Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 Tel: (213) 485-1234 Fax: (213) 891-8763 mark.flagel@lw.com yury.kapgan@lw.com dale.chang@lw.com LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Dean G. Dunlavey 650 Town Center Drive, 20th Floor Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1925 Tel: (714) 540-1235 Fax: (714) 755-8290 dean.dunlavey@lw.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT SYMANTEC CORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on August 29, 2011. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class U.S. mail and/or electronic mail on this same date. /s/ Michael E. Jones Michael E. Jones {A07/7643/0005/W0483922.1 }

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?