Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP. et al

Filing 253

ORDER granting 252 Motion to Withdraw; withdrawing 248 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 09/06/11. cc:attys 9-07-11 (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, ET AL. Defendants. UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. DISK DOCTORS LABS, INC., ET AL. Defendants. UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP., ET AL. Defendants. UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. ENGRASP, INC., ET AL. Defendants. § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:10-CV-373 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:10-CV-471 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:10-CV-472 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:10-CV-591 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § BMC SOFTWARE, INC., ET AL. Defendants. UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. FOXIT CORPORATION, ET AL. Defendants. SYMANTEC CORPORATION, ET AL. Plaintiffs, vs. UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Defendants. CASE NO. 6:10-CV-691 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § vs. CASE NO. 6:10-CV-636 PATENT CASE § § § § § § § § UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 6:11-CV-33 PATENT CASE ORDER GRANTING UNILOC’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW ITS MOTION TO STRIKE PREVIOUSLY CONSTRUED CLAIM TERMS FROM THE PARTIES’ P.R. 4-3 STATEMENT Having considered Uniloc’s Unopposed Motion to Withdraw its Motion to Strike Previously Construed Claim Terms from the Parties’ P.R. 4-3 Statement, the Court finds that Uniloc’s Motion should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Uniloc’s Motion to Strike Previously Construed Claim Terms from the Parties’ P.R. 4-3 Statement (Dkt. No. 248) is hereby withdrawn. 2     So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of September, 2011.                 __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?