Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP. et al

Filing 48

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by FileMaker, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa)

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP. et al

Doc. 48

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC SINGAPORE PRIVATE LIMITED, Plaintiffs, Vs. (1) NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP.; (2) PERVASIVE SOFTWARE, INC.; (3) ADOBE SYSTEMS INC.; (4) FILEMAKER, INC.; (5) SAFENET, INC.; (6) CA, INC.; (7) PINNACLE SYSTEMS, INC.; (8) SONIC SOLUTIONS; (9) ONYX GRAPHICS, INC.; (10) SYMANTEC CORP.; (11) ALADDIN KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS, INC. and (12) ALADDIN KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS LTD. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § §

Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-472

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DEFENDANT FILEMAKER, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Defendant FileMaker, Inc. ("FileMaker") hereby moves the Court to extend the time in which FileMaker may file its Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint, up to and including November 19, 2010. Plaintiffs do not oppose Defendant's motion to extend the time in which to file its Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint.

Dockets.Justia.com

WHEREFORE, Defendant FileMaker, Inc. respectfully prays that the time to file Defendant's Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint be extended up to and including November 19, 2010. Dated: October 27, 2010 Respectfully submitted, GILLAM & SMITH, L.L.P. /s/Melissa Richards Smith___ Melissa Richards Smith Texas State Bar No. 24001351 GILLAM & SMITH, L.L.P. 303 South Washington Avenue Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT FILEMAKER, INC.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 (d) and Local Rule CV-5(e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by U.S. mail or facsimile transmission, on this the 27th day of October, 2010. /s/Melissa Richards Smith Melissa Richards Smith