Parallel Networks, LLC v. Adidas America, Inc. et al

Filing 281

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Sunglass Hut Trading, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp., Corporate Parent Luxottica Group S.p.A. for Sunglass Hut Trading, LLC. (McNabnay, Neil)

Download PDF
Parallel Networks, LLC v. Adidas America, Inc. et al Doc. 281 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION PARALLEL NETWORKS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ADIDAS AMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants. SUNGLASS HUT'S FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1 DISCLOSURE Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Sunglass Hut Trading, LLC, discloses that it is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp. Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp. in turn, is wholly-owned by Luxottica Group S.p.A., which is publicly traded. No other publicly held company owns more than 10% of the stock of either Sunglass Hut Trading, LLC or Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp. 6:10-CV-00491 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED SUNGLASS HUT'S FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1 DISCLOSURE PAGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com Dated: November 22, 2010 Respectfully submitted, FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: /s/ Neil J. McNabnay Thomas M. Melsheimer Texas Bar No. 13922550 txm@fr.com Neil J. McNabnay Texas Bar No. 24002583 njm@fr.com Britnee M. Reamy Texas Bar No. 24053439 bmr@fr.com David B. Conrad Texas Bar No. 24049042 dbc@fr.com 1717 Main Street, Suite 5000 Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 747-5070 Telephone (214) 747-2091 Facsimile Counsel for Defendant SUNGLASS HUT TRADING, LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been served on November 22, 2010, to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). /s/ Neil J. McNabnay Neil J. McNabnay SUNGLASS HUT'S FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1 DISCLOSURE PAGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?