Parallel Networks, LLC v. Adidas America, Inc. et al
Plaintiff's ANSWER to #257 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim of Hasbro, Inc by Parallel Networks, LLC.(Tadlock, Charles)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Parallel Networks, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Adidas America, Inc. et al. Defendants PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO THE COUNTERCLAIMS OF HASBRO, INC. Plaintiff Parallel Networks, LLC ("Parallel Networks") hereby Answers the Counterclaims [Dkt. No. 257] of Defendant Hasbro, Inc. ("Hasbro"), by corresponding paragraph number as follows: ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS INTRODUCTION 320. Admits that through its counterclaims, Hasbro purports to seek a declaration by No. 6:10-cv-00491-LED Jury Trial Demanded
the Court that it does not infringe the patent-in-suit and that the patent-in-suit is invalid, but denies that Hasbro is entitled to such relief, or any further relief. Parallel Networks denies the remaining allegations of paragraph 320 of Defendant's Counterclaims. PARTIES 321. 322. Admitted. Admitted. JURISDICTION 323. Admitted. THE PATENT 1
Admitted. EXISTENCE OF AN ACTUAL CONTROVERSY
325. 326. 327. 328.
Admitted. Admitted. Admitted. Parallel Networks lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegation and
therefore denies the allegation. FIRST COUNTERCLAIM [Declaration of Non-Infringement of the `739 [sic, `111] patent] 329. Parallel Networks incorporates by reference its statements in and responses to the
preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 330. 331. 332. Admitted. Admitted. Admits that Hasbro requests a judicial declaration that it neither has infringed, nor
is infringing, the patent-in-suit, but denies that Hasbro is entitled to such relief, or any further relief. SECOND COUNTERCLAIM [Declaration of Invalidity of the `739 [sic, `111] patent] 333. Parallel Networks incorporates by reference its statements in and responses to the
preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 334. 335. Admitted. Admitted.
Admits that Hasbro requests a judicial declaration that the claims of the patent-in-
suit are invalid and unenforceable, but denies that Hasbro is entitled to such relief, or any further relief. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Parallel Networks denies that Hasbro, Inc. is entitled to any relief, including that requested in its Prayer for Relief. JURY DEMAND Hasbro, Inc.'s Jury Demand is an averment to which no responsive pleading is required.
Dated: December 16, 2010
Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Charles Craig Tadlock Charles Craig Tadlock Texas State Bar No. 00791766 TADLOCK LAW FIRM 400 E. Royal Lane, Suite 290 Irving, Texas 75039 214-785-6014 (phone) firstname.lastname@example.org and 315 N. Broadway, Suite 307 Tyler, Texas 75702 903-283-2758 (phone) George S. Bosy (pro hac vice) David R. Bennett (pro hac vice) Bosy & Bennett 300 N. La Salle St. 49th Floor Chicago, IL 60654 Telephone: (312) 803-0437 Email: email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF PARALLEL NETWORKS, LLC 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served this 16th day of December, 2010, with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). Any other counsel of record will be served by electronic mail, facsimile transmission and/or first class mail on this same date. /s/ Charles Craig Tadlock One of the Attorneys for Parallel Networks, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?