WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 119

NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. Disclosures Under P.R. 3-4 (Deoras, Akshay)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION WI-LAN INC., Plaintiff, v. ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.; TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON; ERICSSON INC.; SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB; SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.; HTC CORPORATION; HTC AMERICA, INC.; EXEDEA INC. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 6:10-CV-521-LED ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF ALCATEL-LUCENT USA’S P.R. 3-4 DISCLOSURES Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. hereby notifies the Court that it complied with Local Patent Rule 3-4 by serving Plaintiff Wi-LAN Inc. with the required disclosures via Federal Express on September 14, 2011, in accordance with the Court’s Docket Control Order. Dated: September 14, 2011 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Akshay S. Deoras______________ Gregory S. Arovas (pro hac vice) Robert A. Appleby (pro hac vice) Akshay S. Deoras (pro hac vice) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 Tel: (212) 446-4800 Fax: (212) 446-4900 Alcatel-Lucent-Wi-LANDefense@kirkland.com Michael E. Jones Allen F. Gardner POTTER MINTON PC 110 N. College, Suite 500 (75702) P.O. Box 359 Tyler, Texas 75710 (903) 597 8311 (903) 593 0846 (Facsimile) mikejones@potterminton.com allengardner@potterminton.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this the 14th day of September, 2011. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class U.S. mail on this same date. /s/ Akshay S. Deoras____________ Akshay S. Deoras 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?