WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
Filing
129
Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Invalidity Contentions by Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Ericsson Inc., Exedea INC., HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wynne, Richard)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
WI–LAN INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:10–CV–521–LED
ALCATEL–LUCENT USA INC., et al.,
Defendants.
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT
DEFENDANTS’ INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
Defendants Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Ericsson Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson,
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA)
Inc., HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc, and Exedea, Inc. hereby file their Unopposed Motion
for Leave to Supplement Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions. Defendants request leave to add
additional prior art references discovered after service of their Invalidity Contentions. Plaintiff
does not oppose this Motion.
In accordance with Local Patent Rules 3–3 and 3–4 as well as the Court’s Docket Control
Order, Defendants served their Invalidity Contentions on September 2, 2011. After that date,
Defendants discovered additional prior art they believe is relevant to this action. Defendants
notified Plaintiff of their intention to seek leave to supplement their Invalidity Contentions, and
Plaintiff does not oppose this Motion. Therefore, Defendants respectfully request the Court to
grant their Unopposed Motion for Leave to Supplement Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Richard L. Wynne, Jr.
Bruce S. Sostek (Lead Attorney)
State Bar No. 18855700
Bruce.Sostek@tklaw.com
Richard L. Wynne, Jr.
State Bar No. 24003214
Richard.Wynne@tklaw.com
Matthew P. Harper
State Bar No. 24037777
Matt.Harper@tklaw.com
THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP
1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500
Dallas, Texas 75201
214.969.1700
214.969.1751 (facsimile)
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS ERICSSON INC.,
TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON,
SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS
(USA) INC. and SONY ERICSSON MOBILE
COMMUNICATIONS AB
–2–
/s/ Martin R. Bader w/perm. R. Wynne
Stephen S. Korniczky (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Martin R. Bader (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
12275 El Camino Real, Suite 200
San Diego, California 92130
Telephone: (858) 720-8900
Facsimile: (858) 509-3691
skorniczky@sheppardmullin.com
mbader@sheppardmullin.com
Eric H. Findlay
State Bar No. 00789886
FINDLAY CRAFT LLP
6760 Old Jacksonville Highway, Suite 101
Tyler, Texas 75703
Telephone: (903) 534-1100
Facsimile: (903) 534-1137
Email: efindlay@findlaycraft.com
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., and
EXEDEA, INC.
–3–
/s/ Akshay S. Deoras w/perm. R. Wynne
Gregory S. Arovas (pro hac vice)
Robert A. Appleby (pro hac vice)
Akshay S. Deoras (pro hac vice)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Tel: (212) 446-4800
Fax: (212) 446-4900
Alcatel-Lucent-Wi-LANDefense@kirkland.com
Michael E. Jones
Allen F. Gardner
POTTER MINTON PC
110 N. College, Suite 500 (75702)
P.O. Box 359
Tyler, Texas 75710
(903) 597 8311
(903) 593 0846 (Facsimile)
mikejones@potterminton.com
allengardner@potterminton.com
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
ALCATEL–LUCENT USA INC.
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I hereby certify that on October 17, 2011, counsel for Defendants conferred with John
Fedock, counsel for Plaintiff, regarding this motion. Counsel for Plaintiff stated that Plaintiff
does not oppose the motion.
/s/ Richard L. Wynne, Jr.
Richard L. Wynne, Jr.
–4–
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are being
served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on
this the 21st day of October, 2011. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class U.S.
mail on this same date.
/s/ Richard L. Wynne, Jr.
Richard L. Wynne, Jr.
–5–
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?