WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 326

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Claire Abernathy Henry on behalf of WI-LAN Inc. (Henry, Claire)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION WI-LAN INC., Plaintiff, v. ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.; TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON; ERICSSON INC.; SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB; SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.; HTC CORPORATION; HTC AMERICA, INC.; EXEDEA INC.; LG ELECTRONICS, INC.; LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC.; LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC. Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-521 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF CLAIRE ABERNATHY HENRY COMES NOW Plaintiff, Wi-LAN Inc., and hereby notifies the Court and all parties of record that, in addition to the attorneys already representing it, Claire Abernathy Henry, State Bar Number 24053063, of the Ward & Smith Law Firm, 1127 Judson Rd., Suite 220, Longview, Texas, 75606-1231, (903) 757-6400, will be appearing as an attorney of record on its behalf in the above-styled and numbered cause. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Claire Abernathy Henry Claire Abernathy Henry State Bar No. 24053063 WARD & SMITH LAW FIRM 1127 Judson Rd., Suite 220 Longview, Texas 75601 (903) 757-6400 (telephone) (903) 757-2323 (facsimile) E-mail: claire@wsfirm.com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). Therefore, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by email on this the 25th day of February, 2013. /s/ Claire Abernathy Henry Claire Abernathy Henry

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?