WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
Filing
326
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Claire Abernathy Henry on behalf of WI-LAN Inc. (Henry, Claire)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
WI-LAN INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.;
TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM
ERICSSON; ERICSSON INC.; SONY
ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS
AB; SONY ERICSSON MOBILE
COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.; HTC
CORPORATION; HTC AMERICA, INC.;
EXEDEA INC.; LG ELECTRONICS, INC.;
LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A.,
INC.; LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-521
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF CLAIRE ABERNATHY HENRY
COMES NOW Plaintiff, Wi-LAN Inc., and hereby notifies the Court and all parties of
record that, in addition to the attorneys already representing it, Claire Abernathy Henry, State
Bar Number 24053063, of the Ward & Smith Law Firm, 1127 Judson Rd., Suite 220, Longview,
Texas, 75606-1231, (903) 757-6400, will be appearing as an attorney of record on its behalf in
the above-styled and numbered cause.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Claire Abernathy Henry
Claire Abernathy Henry
State Bar No. 24053063
WARD & SMITH LAW FIRM
1127 Judson Rd., Suite 220
Longview, Texas 75601
(903) 757-6400 (telephone)
(903) 757-2323 (facsimile)
E-mail: claire@wsfirm.com
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in
compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). Therefore, this document was served on all counsel who
are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have
consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by
email on this the 25th day of February, 2013.
/s/ Claire Abernathy Henry
Claire Abernathy Henry
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?