WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 464

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Leonard Davis: Day 6 of Jury Trial completed on 7/15/2013. (Court Reporter Shea Sloan & Judy Werlinger.) (cwk)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
DATE:

July 15, 2013

LEONARD DAVIS
Judge Presiding
Court Reporter: Shea Sloan & Judy Werlinger
Judicial Assistant: Carrie King

Law Clerk: Josue Caballero
Chief Staff Attorney: Nicole Mitchell
WI-LAN, INC.

CIVIL ACTION NO: 6:10cv521
JURY TRIAL – DAY 6

V.
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC., ET AL.
WI-LAN, INC.

CIVIL ACTION NO: 6:13cv252
JURY TRIAL – DAY 6

V.
HTC CORPORATION, ET AL.
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS

SEE SIGN-IN SHEETS

On this day, came the parties by their attorneys and the following proceedings were had:
OPEN: 8:58 AM
TIME:
9:00 AM

ADJOURN:

1:58 PM

MINUTES:
Trial resumed. Jury Panel seated in Courtroom.
Court welcomed the parties. Court Charge given to the Jury.

10:08 AM

Jury excused for break. Court in recess.

10:25 AM

Trial resumed. Jury Panel seated in Courtroom.

Mr. Weaver presented closing arguments to the Jury on behalf of Plaintiff, WI-LAN
Inc.
Mr. Arovas requested to approach the bench. Bench conference held.
Mr. Hill presented additional closing arguments to the Jury on behalf of Plaintiff.
Mr. Arovas presented closing arguments to the Jury on behalf of all Defendants.
Mr. Hill presented rebuttal closing arguments to the Jury on behalf of Plaintiff.
Court addressed the Jury and gave them some final instructions.
12:25 PM

Jury excused to commence deliberations.
Court addressed the parties and inquired if there was anything further. Nothing further.

12:26 PM

Court in recess. Jury deliberating.

TIME:

MINUTES:

1:32 PM

Trial resumed.
Court addressed the parties. Jury Panel seated in Courtroom.

1:37 PM

Court addressed jury and inquired if they have reached a verdict. Jury foreperson
responded. Verdict form tendered to the Court.
Court asked Clerk to read the verdict. Verdict read. Court inquired if the parties
wished to poll the jury. No polling requested.
Court addressed the jury and gave them further instructions. Court excused the jury
to the jury room where someone would be there to excuse them.
Jury excused from the Courtroom.
Court addressed the parties. Nothing further from the parties.

1:38 PM

There being nothing further, Court adjourned.