WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 471

AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 07/22/13. (mll, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
WI-LAN INC.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.,
ET AL.,
Defendants.

WI-LAN INC.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
HTC CORPORATION,
ET AL.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 6:10-CV-521

CASE NO. 6:13-CV-252

AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT
This action was tried by a jury with the undersigned presiding, and the jury has reached a
verdict.
It is ORDERED that Defendants Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.; Ericsson Inc.; and
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson did not infringe the following claims:
Claims 2, 5, and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326;
Claims 11 and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 6,195,327; and
Claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,222,819.

It is also ORDERED that Defendants HTC Corporation; HTC America, Inc.; Exedea Inc.; Sony
Mobile Communications AB; and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. did not infringe the
following claims:
Claims 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,381,211.
It is further ORDERED that the following claims are invalid:
Claims 2, 5, and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326;
Claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,222,819; and
Claims 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,381,211.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Wi-Lan
Inc. take nothing from Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.; Ericsson Inc.; Telefonaktiebolaget LM
.
Ericsson; HTC Corporation; HTC America, Inc.; Exedea Inc.; Sony Mobile Communications
AB; and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) and that all
pending motions are DENIED.
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants’ costs of
court should be taxed against Plaintiff. The parties are directed to the Standing Order Regarding
Bill of Costs on the Court’s website.
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 22nd day of July, 2013.