WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 520

ORDER granting 519 Stipulation of Dismissal. All claims and counterclaims between Plaintiff and Defendants HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., and Exedea, Inc are dismissed with prejudice. Parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 10/02/13. (mll, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

WI-LAN INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., et al.,
Defendants.

Civil Action No. 6:10-CV-521-LED
Civil Action No. 6:13-CV-252-LED
CASES CONSOLIDATED FOR TRIAL

ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff Wi-LAN, Inc.’s (“Wi-LAN”) and Defendants HTC
Corporation, HTC America, Inc., and Exedea, Inc.’s (collectively “HTC”), Stipulation And Joint
Motion To Dismiss, which represents that Wi-LAN and HTC have reached and signed a binding
term sheet (“Term Sheet”) that, among other things, resolves the current dispute. The Motion is
GRANTED.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)

All claims at issue between Wi-LAN and HTC in this action, including all claims
presented by Wi-LAN and all of HTC’s counterclaims, are dismissed with
prejudice;

(2)

Wi-LAN and HTC each shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees;

(3)

The following are ordered WITHDRAWN:
a. HTC’s Motion to Recover Attorneys’ Fees (13-CV-252, Dkt. 433) and
HTC’s joinder to Defendants’ Motion to Recover Attorneys’ Fees (10CV-521, Dkt. No. 475);

b. HTC’s Agreed Bill of Costs (13-CV-252, Dkt. No. 435);
c. HTC’s joinder to Defendants’ oppositions (10-CV-521, Dkt. Nos. 491,
492) to Wi-LAN’s Motion for a New Trial (13-CV-252, Dkt. No. 436; 10CV-521, Dkt. No. 481) and Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of
Law of No Invalidity (13-CV-525, Dkt. No. 437; 10-CV-521, Dkt. No.
482);
d. HTC’s opposition (10-CV-521, Dkt. No. 495) to Wi-LAN, Ericsson, and
Sony Mobile’s Partially Opposed Joint Motion to Seal Certain Trial
Exhibits;
e. HTC’s joinder to any other pending motions or oppositions filed by
defendants in this action.
(4)

This Court shall retain and maintain jurisdiction to enforce any terms of the Term
Sheet referenced above.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 2nd day of October, 2013.

__________________________________
LEONARD DAVIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE