Revels v. Director, TDCJ-CID

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING 4 Report and Recommendations. The application for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice, as improvidently filed and pursuant to the sanctions previously imposed against Revels. All motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. The Clerk of Court is reminded not to accept any future filings from Revels until all sanctions are paid and he has permission to file from a judge of this Court. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 03/23/11. cc:petr 3-24-11(mll, )

Download PDF
-JDL Revels v. Director, TDCJ-CID Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION KEVIN LYNN REVELS, #654284 VS. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID ORDER OF DISMISSAL CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11cv65 The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice as improvidently filed and pursuant to the sanctions previously imposed against Revels. All motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. The Clerk of Court is reminded not to accept any future filings from Revels until all sanctions are paid and he has permission to file from a judge of this Court. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 23rd day of March, 2011. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?