Azure Networks LLC et al v. CSR plc et al

Filing 290

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 267 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. All objections are overruled and Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 5/17/2013. (gsg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
AZURE NETWORKS, LLC et al.,
vs.
CSR PLC, et al.

§
§
§
§
§

NO. 6:11cv139 MHS-JDL
PATENT CASE

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate
Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 267) (“Report and Recommendation”), which contains his finding
that certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,756,129 (“the ‘129 Patent”) are not invalid for
indefiniteness, has been presented for consideration. Defendants Atheros Communications, Inc.,
Broadcom Corporation, CSR plc, Cambridge Silicon Radio International LLC, Marvell
Semiconductor, Inc., Qualcomm Incorporated, Ralink Technology Corporation [Taiwan], Ralink
Technology Corporation [USA], Texas Instruments Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) have filed
objections to the Report and Recommendations pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
72(b) (Doc. No. 271). Plaintiff Azure Networks, LLC has filed a Response (Doc. No. 280).
.
Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge’s
conclusions are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation
of the United States Magistrate Judge as the opinion of this Court. All objections are overruled
and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness (Doc. No. 248)
is DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 17th day of May, 2013.

____________________________________
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE