Hasue & Associates, Inc. v. Dyno Nobel Inc. et al

Filing 57

ORDER ADOPTING 56 Report and Recommendations, and granting 55 Motion to Dismiss filed by Dyno Nobel Inc., Hasue & Associates, Inc. This civil action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Any motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 08/11/11. cc:attys 8-12-11(mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION HASUE & ASSOCIATES, INC. § v. § DYNO NOBLE, INC. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11CV143 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this case has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the Joint Motion to Dismiss (document #55) be granted and that all claims, including counterclaims, be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) and (c). The Report and Recommendation further recommends that the Court retain jurisdiction over all disputes relating to or concerning the Settlement Agreement and the relationship between the parties. No written objections have been filed. The Court therefore adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as those of the Court. In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Dismiss (document #55) is GRANTED and the aboveentitled lawsuit, including any counterclaims, is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court Page 1 of 2 retains jurisdiction, however, as to the Settlement Agreement and the relationship between the parties as it relates to the Settlement Agreement. Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 11th day of August, 2011. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE N :\C iv il\R e fe rra ls \H a s u e - O D .w p d Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?