Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 419

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: granting 314 Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness; granting 418 Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief. Plaintiff's objections are overruled. The Court adopts the Order of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 01/22/14. (mll, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
EIDOS DISPLAY, LLC,
and EIDOS III, LLC

§
§
§
v.
§
§
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION;
§
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION
§
AMERICA;
§
CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. §

No. 6:11-cv-00201-LED-JDL

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate
Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge (“Report”), which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendation
for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 412). The
Magistrate Judge recommends granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of
Indefiniteness (Doc. No. 314). Plaintiff filed objections (Doc. No. 415) to which Defendants
replied (Doc. No. 416). Plaintiff filed a response (Doc. No. 417) accompanied by a Motion for
Leave to Allow a Reply Brief (Doc. No. 418) which is hereby GRANTED.
The Court is of the opinion that the conclusion of the Magistrate Judge is correct.
Plaintiff’s objections are overruled. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Order of the United
States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court and Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness is GRANTED.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 22nd day of January, 2014.

__________________________________
LEONARD DAVIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE