Telford v. United States of America et al

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING 25 Report and Recommendations; granting 13 Motion to Dismiss, denying Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 21 Motion to Dismiss Based Upon Improper Venue. Plaintiff's claims against individual defendants and her claim broug ht pursuant to 26 USC 7433 are DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendant withdrew its motion for summary judgment as to pltf's claim brought against the US pursuant to 26 USC 7422 and that portion of the motion is DENIED. Pltf's refund claim brought pursuant to 26 USC 7422 is DISMISSED without prejudice. Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 01/03/12. cc:pltf & dft 1-04-12 (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION RUTH TELFORD § v. § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11CV347 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contain her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this matter has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the Motion to Dismiss and/or Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint (document #13) be granted in part and denied in part. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the motion be granted as to Plaintiff’s claims against the individual defendants and her claim brought pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7433, and that these claims be dismissed with prejudice. The Report and Recommendation further recommends that the Motion to Dismiss Based Upon Improper Venue (document #21) be granted, such that Plaintiff’s only remaining claim – her refund claim brought pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7422 – should be dismissed without prejudice. No written objections have been filed. Plaintiff was granted permission to file pleadings electronically in this case and the Report and Recommendation was sent to her electronically on Page 1 of 2 November 30, 2011. The Court therefore adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as those of the Court. In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss and/or Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint (document #13) is GRANTED in part, as to Plaintiff’s claims against the individual defendants and her claim brought pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7433. These claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendant withdrew its motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff’s claim brought against the United States pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7422 and that portion of the motion is accordingly DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss Based Upon Improper Venue (document #21) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s refund claim brought pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7422 is DISMISSED without prejudice. It is finally ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3rd day of January, 2012. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?