Chance v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
Filing
83
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Order adopting 71 Second Report and Recommendations of the US Magistrate Judge. It is ORDERED that the Defendants' 59 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. All motions by either party not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 8/8/2012. (leh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
WILLIAM E. CHANCE, JR., #644505
§
VS.
§
TDCJ, ET AL.
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11cv435
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff William E. Chance, Jr., an inmate confined in the Texas prison system, filed the
above-styled and numbered lawsuit. The complaint was referred to United States Magistrate Judge
John D. Love, who issued a Second Report and Recommendation concluding that the Defendants’
motion for summary judgment should be granted. Plaintiff has filed objections.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and
recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and having
made a de novo review of the objections raised by Plaintiff, the Court is of the opinion that the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections by Plaintiff are
without merit. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate
Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the Second Report and Recommendation (docket entry #71) is ADOPTED.
It is further
ORDERED that the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (docket entry #59) is
GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is finally
1
ORDERED that all motions by either party not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 8th day of August, 2012.
____________________________________
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?