Dennie v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING 4 Report and Recommendations. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust state habeas corpus remedies. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 10/12/11. cc:petr 10-13-11(mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
WILLIAM DAVID DENNIE, #1444462
§
VS.
§
DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11cv459
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States
Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the
petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed for failure to exhaust state habeas corpus
remedies. The Petitioner has filed objections.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her proposed findings of fact and
recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and having
made a de novo review of the objections raised by the Petitioner to the Report, the Court is of the
opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections of the
Petitioner are without merit. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice for
failure to exhaust state habeas corpus remedies. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is finally
ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 12th day of October, 2011.
__________________________________
LEONARD DAVIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?