Reagan v. Commissioner SSA

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING 17 Report and Recommendations. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and the social security action is DISMISSED with prejudice. All motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 07/18/13. (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION FRANCES MARIE REAGAN § VS. § COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11cv613 ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff Frances Marie Reagan filed the above-styled and numbered civil action pursuant to the Social Security Act, Section 205(g) for judicial review of the Commissioners’s denial of her application for Social Security benefits. The cause of action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the decision of the Commissioner should be affirmed and the complaint should be dismissed. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (docket entry #17) is ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and the social security action is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is finally 1 . ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. It is SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 18th day of July, 2013. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?