Blanton v. USA
ORDER ADOPTING 7 Report and Recommendations. The motion to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 is DENIED and the cause of action is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 01/10/12. cc:pltf 1-10-12(mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JAMAL BLANTON, #11096-078
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11cv649
CRIM. NO. 6:04CR00006-001
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States
Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the
above-styled and numbered motion to vacate, set aside or correct a sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 should be denied. The Movant has filed objections.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and
recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and having
made a de novo review of the objections raised by the Movant to the Report, the Court is of the
opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections by
the Movant are without merit. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the motion to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 is DENIED and the cause of action is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further
ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is finally
ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 10th day of January, 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?