Burrough v. Livingston et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 56 Report and Recommendations, granting 47 Motion for Summary Judgment amd Dismissing Case. All motions by either party not previously ruled on are denied. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 8/27/13. (mjc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
ROBERT ANTHONY BURROUGH
BRAD LIVINGSTON, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:12cv339
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff Robert Anthony Burrough, an inmate confined in the Texas prison system, filed the
above-styled and numbered civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was referred to United States
Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Third Report and Recommendation concluding that
the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment should be granted. The Plaintiff has filed objections.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and
recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and having
made a de novo review of the objections raised by the Plaintiff, the Court is of the opinion that the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections by the Plaintiff are
without merit. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate
Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the Third Report and Recommendation (docket entry #56) is ADOPTED.
It is further
ORDERED that the Defendants Ham, Murray and Walton’s motion for summary judgment
(docket entry #47) is GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is finally
ORDERED that all motions by either party not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 27th day of August, 2013.
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?