Landrum v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
ORDER ADOPTING 17 Report and Recommendations. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 11/05/12. cc:attys 11-05-12(mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JOHN NELSON LANDRUM, #1501266
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:12cv437
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Petitioner John Nelson Landrum, a prisoner confined in the Texas prison system, proceeding
pro se, filed the above-styled and numbered petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254. The petition was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a
Report and Recommendation concluding that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be
dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies and as time-barred. The Petitioner has filed objections.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contain his proposed findings
of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration,
and having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Petitioner, the Court is of the opinion
that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Thus the Court hereby adopts
the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (docket entry #17) is ADOPTED. It is
ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is
ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is finally
ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 5th day of November, 2012.
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?