Farris v. Astrue

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 15 Report and Recommendations, reversing and remanding this case back to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for proceedings consistent with this Court's opinion. Further ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 3/25/14. (mjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BRENDA FARRIS § v. § COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:12-CV-803 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Brenda A. Farris filed the above-styled and numbered civil action pursuant to the Social Security Act, Section 205(g), for judicial review of the Commissioners’s denial of her application for Social Security benefits. The cause of action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the decision of the Commissioner should be reversed and the cause should be remanded to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Neither party has filed any objections. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and that the cause be remanded to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for proceedings consistent with this Court’s opinion. It is further ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED.   So ORDERED and SIGNED this 25th day of March, 2014. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2   

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?