Palculict v. Astrue
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Commissioner's Unopposed Motion To Reverse With Remand And Enter Judgment 12 is hereby GRANTED. The complaint is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the findings above. Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 10/07/13. (mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
KATHOLYN A. PALCULICT
§
v.
§
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:13CV188
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings,
conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this action, has been presented for
consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the Commissioner’s Unopposed
Motion To Reverse With Remand And Enter Judgment (docket entry #12) be granted and this action
be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for such further
administrative proceedings consistent with the findings of the Magistrate Judge.
objections have been filed.
No written
The findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are therefore
adopted as those of the Court.
In light of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion To Reverse With Remand And
Enter Judgment (docket entry #12) is hereby GRANTED. It is further
ORDERED that the complaint is hereby REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the
1
findings above. It is further
ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 7th day of October, 2013.
__________________________________
LEONARD DAVIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?