Palculict v. Astrue

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Commissioner's Unopposed Motion To Reverse With Remand And Enter Judgment 12 is hereby GRANTED. The complaint is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the findings above. Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 10/07/13. (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION KATHOLYN A. PALCULICT § v. § COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:13CV188 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this action, has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion To Reverse With Remand And Enter Judgment (docket entry #12) be granted and this action be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for such further administrative proceedings consistent with the findings of the Magistrate Judge. objections have been filed. No written The findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are therefore adopted as those of the Court. In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion To Reverse With Remand And Enter Judgment (docket entry #12) is hereby GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the complaint is hereby REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the 1 findings above. It is further ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 7th day of October, 2013. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?