Smith v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this cause is remanded to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for proceedings consistent with this Court's opinion. Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 09/15/14. (mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:13-CV-273
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES
Plaintiff Jana Smith filed the above-styled and numbered civil action pursuant to the Social
Security Act, Section 205(g), for judicial review of the Commissioners’s denial of her application
for Social Security benefits. The cause of action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K.
Nicole Mitchell, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the decision of the
Commissioner should be reversed and the cause should be remanded to the Commissioner of the
Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Court.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her proposed findings of fact and
recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Neither
party has filed any objections. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and that the cause be
remanded to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for proceedings consistent with
this Court’s opinion. It is further
ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 15th day of September, 2014.
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?