Burton v. Inmate Trust Fund
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 20 Report and Recommendations. This civil action is DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Any and all motions which may be pending in this action are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 08/22/13. (mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
BOBBY E. BURTON JR. #836846
§
v.
§
INMATE TRUST FUND
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:13cv348
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT
The Plaintiff Bobby Burton, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C.
§1983 complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights in the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division. This Court ordered that the case be referred to
the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order
for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges.
Burton complained of a hold which was placed on his inmate trust account in 2000, some
13 years prior to the filing of this lawsuit. After review of the pleadings, the Magistrate Judge issued
a Report recommending that the case be dismissed as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon
which relief could be granted due to the expiration of the statute of limitations.
Burton received a copy of the Magistrate Judge’s Report on July 9, 2013, but filed no
objections thereto; accordingly, he is barred from de novo review by the district judge of those
findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate
review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the
district court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir.
1996) (en banc).
The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge.
Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See
1
United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243
(1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review is
“clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.”). It is accordingly
ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (docket no. 20) is hereby ADOPTED as
the opinion of the District Court. It is further
ORDERED that the above-styled civil action be and hereby is DISMISSED with prejudice
as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. §1915A(b).
.
It is further
ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this action are hereby
DENIED. Finally, it is
ORDERED that the Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the Administrator of the Strikes
List for the Eastern District of Texas.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 22nd day of August, 2013.
____________________________________
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?