Smartflash LLC et al v. Apple Inc, et al

Filing 482

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 390 Report and Recommendations, and denying Apple's and Defendants' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-infringement (6:13CV447, 271 & 272 ; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 322). Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 2/13/15. (mjc, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
SMARTFLASH LLC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
APPLE INC., et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

§
§
§
§
Plaintiffs,
v.
§
§
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. §
et al.,
§
§
Defendants.
§
§

CASE NO. 6:13cv447-JRG-KNM

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

SMARTFLASH LLC, et al.,

CASE NO. 6:13cv448-JRG-KNM
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER
Before the Court are Apple’s and Defendants’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment of
Non-infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 271 & 272; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 322) and the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 390; 6:13CV448; Doc. No.
436) recommending that the Motions be denied. Having considered Defendants’ Objections to the
Report and Recommendation Regarding Apple’s and Defendants’ Motions for Partial Summary
Judgment of Non-infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 415, 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 480), and having
conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation as to
which objection was made, and finding no error therein, the Court does hereby adopt the findings
and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Apple’s and Defendants’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment of
Non-infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 271 & 272; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 322) are DENIED.

SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 13th day of February, 2015.

____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2