Smartflash LLC et al v. Apple Inc, et al

Filing 487

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 388 Report and Recommendations, and denying Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding Invalidity Under Sections 102, 103 (6:13CV447, 270 ; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 325). Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 2/13/15. (mjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION SMARTFLASH LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. APPLE INC., et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § Plaintiffs, v. § § SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. § et al., § § Defendants. § § CASE NO. 6:13cv447-JRG-KNM JURY TRIAL DEMANDED SMARTFLASH LLC, et al., CASE NO. 6:13cv448-JRG-KNM JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding Invalidity Under Sections 102, 103 (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 270; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 325) and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 388; 6:13CV448; Doc. No. 434) recommending that the Motions be denied. Having considered Defendants’ Objections to the Report and Recommendation Regarding Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding Invalidity (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 414; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 448), and having conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation as to which objection was made, and finding no error therein, the Court does hereby adopt the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding Invalidity Under Sections 102, 103 (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 270; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 325) are DENIED. SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 13th day of February, 2015. ____________________________________ RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?