Smartflash LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 488

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 434 Report and Recommendations, and denying Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding Invalidity Under Sections 102, 103 (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 270; 6:13CV448, 325 ). Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 2/13/15. (mjc, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
SMARTFLASH LLC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
APPLE INC., et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

§
§
§
§
Plaintiffs,
v.
§
§
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. §
et al.,
§
§
Defendants.
§
§

CASE NO. 6:13cv447-JRG-KNM

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

SMARTFLASH LLC, et al.,

CASE NO. 6:13cv448-JRG-KNM
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER
Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding Invalidity
Under Sections 102, 103 (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 270; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 325) and the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 388; 6:13CV448; Doc. No.
434) recommending that the Motions be denied. Having considered Defendants’ Objections to the
Report and Recommendation Regarding Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding
Invalidity (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 414; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 448), and having conducted a de novo
determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation as to which objection was
made, and finding no error therein, the Court does hereby adopt the findings and recommendations
of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding Invalidity
Under Sections 102, 103 (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 270; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 325) are DENIED.

SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 13th day of February, 2015.

____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2