Verde et al v. Stoneridge, Inc. et al
Filing
232
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 204 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, and DENYING 136 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Arrow Manufacturing Co. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 9/29/2015. (gsg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
FERNANDO VERDE, et al.
v.
STONERIDGE, INC., et al.
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO.
6:14-CV-157-MHS-KNM
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings,
conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of Defendant Arrow Manufacturing Co.’s
Motion to Dismiss Cross-Plaintiffs’ Cross-Claim for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Docket
No. 136) has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation (Docket No.
204) recommends that Defendant’s
Motion to Dismiss be denied. Defendant Arrow
.
Manufacturing Co. filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation on July 10, 2015.
Having made a de novo review of the written objections filed by Defendant, the Court
.
concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the
objections are without merit. In light of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that Defendant Arrow Manufacturing Co.’s Motion to Dismiss CrossPlaintiffs’ Cross-Claim for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Docket No. 136) is DENIED.
SIGNED this 29th day of September, 2015.
____________________________________
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?