Johnson v. Colvin

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 16 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. ORDERED that Plaintiffs objections are OVERRULED. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and this Social Security action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 9/29/2015. (gsg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION MICHAEL SHANE JOHNSON vs. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14cv281 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this action, has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed and that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff filed written objections on September 16, 2015. Having made a de novo review of the objections filed by Plaintiff, the Court finds that the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and Plaintiff’s objections are without merit. The objections raised by Plaintiff are the same arguments raised in his briefing that are fully considered in the Report and Recommendation. There is substantial evidence in the record supporting the Commissioner’s decision. The findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are, therefore, adopted as those of the Court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and this Social Security action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further 1 ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. SIGNED this 29th day of September, 2015. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?