Wilson v. Richy et al

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Report of the Magistrate Judge 3 is hereby ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. The above-styled civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. All motions which may be pending in this action are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 11/24/14. (mll, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
XAVIER WILSON

§

v.

§

LINDA RICHY, ET AL.

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14cv338

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT
The Plaintiff filed this civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. §1983 complaining of alleged
violations of his constitutional rights. This Court ordered that the case be referred to the United
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the
Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges.
On August 4, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that the lawsuit be
dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. No objections
to this Report have been received; accordingly, the Plaintiff is barred from de novo review by the
district judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of
plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal
conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile
Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).
The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge.
Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See
United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243
(1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review is
“clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.”). It is accordingly

.
ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (docket no. 3) is hereby ADOPTED as
the opinion of the District Court. It is further
ORDERED that the above-styled civil action be and hereby is DISMISSED without prejudice
for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. Finally, it is
ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this action are hereby
DENIED.
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24th day of November, 2014.

2