Flores v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for purposes of in forma pauperis proceedings. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is DENIED. Flores may resume the lawsuit if he pays the full filing fee of $400 and provides proof that he has paid the $50 in sanctions imposed by the Southern District of Texas within thirty days of the issuance of the Final Judgment. All motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 11/24/14. (mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
DANNY FLORES, #1824094
§
VS.
§
TEXAS DEPT. OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14cv775
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The above-styled and numbered civil action was heretofore directly assigned to United States
Magistrate Judge John D. Love. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which
contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been
presented for consideration, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the
opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts same as the
findings and conclusions of the Court. It is therefore
.
ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for purposes of in forma
pauperis proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Flores’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis
(docket entry #3) is DENIED. Flores may resume the lawsuit if he pays the full filing fee of $400 and
provides proof that he has paid the $50 in sanctions imposed by the Southern District of Texas within
thirty days of the issuance of the Final Judgment. It is finally
ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED.
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24th day of November, 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?