Roberts v. Kniganga et al

Filing 34

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Report and Recommendation 25 is ADOPTED. Plaintiff is permitted to proceed with his excessive use of force claims against Officer Kniganga and Sgt. Luckett, as well as the claims of retaliation and denial of medical care against Sgt. Luckett. Plaintiff's claims against Regional Director Scott and Officer Ama are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 01/12/16. (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION LACRAIG ROBERTS, #1754303 § VS. § HENRY KNIGANGA, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14cv801 ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore assigned to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (docket entry #25) is ADOPTED. It is . further ORDERED that Plaintiff is permitted to proceed with his excessive use of force claims against Officer Kniganga and Sgt. Luckett, as well as the claims of retaliation and denial of medical care against Sgt. Luckett. It is finally ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Regional Director Scott and Officer Ama are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). SIGNED this 12th day of January, 2016. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?