Ducker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Report and Recommendation 10 is ADOPTED. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 02/04/15. (mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JAMES DAVID DUCKER, #913656
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14cv889
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Petitioner James David Ducker, a prisoner confined in the Texas prison system, proceeding
pro se, filed the above-styled and numbered petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 concerning a prison disciplinary matter. The petition was referred to United States Magistrate
Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the case should be
The Petitioner filed objections. His objections focus on corporate entities and contracts, which
have nothing to do with the present lawsuit. His objections are nonresponsive and frivolous.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contain his proposed findings
of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration,
and having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Petitioner, the Court is of the opinion
that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Thus the Court hereby adopts
the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (docket entry #10) is ADOPTED. It is
ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is
ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is finally
ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 4th day of February, 2015.
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?