Secured Structures, LLC v. Alarm Security Group, LLC

Filing 116

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 109 Report and Recommendations and denying without prejudice 12 Motion to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim filed by Alarm Security Group, LLC, Defendant Guardian Protection Services, Inc. 9;s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-937, ECF 12), Defendant Interface Security Systems, LLC's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-938, ECF 12), Defendant Monitronics I nternational, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-940, ECF 12),Defendant Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-941, ECF 12) and Defendant Vector Security, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-944, ECF 12). Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 3/29/16. (mjc, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
SECURED STRUCTURES, LLC
vs.
ALARM SECURITY GROUP, LLC

§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 6:14-CV-930
LEAD CASE

______________________________________________________________________________
SECURED STRUCTURES, LLC

§
§
vs.
§
CASE NO. 6:14-CV-937
§
GUARDIAN PROTECTION
§
§
SERVICES, INC.
§
______________________________________________________________________________
SECURED STRUCTURES, LLC

§
§
vs.
§
CASE NO. 6:14-CV-938
§
INTERFACE SECURITY SYSTEMS,
§
LLC
§
§
______________________________________________________________________________
SECURED STRUCTURES, LLC

§
§
vs.
§
CASE NO. 6:14-CV-940
§
MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL,
§
INC.
§
§
______________________________________________________________________________

1

SECURED STRUCTURES, LLC

§
§
§
CASE NO. 6:14-CV-941
vs.
§
PROTECTION ONE ALARM
§
MONITORING, INC.
§
§
______________________________________________________________________________
SECURED STRUCTURES, LLC
vs.
VECTOR SECURITY, INC.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 6:14-CV-944

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings,
conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of the motions to dismiss has been
presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation (ECF 109), filed on March 10,
2016, recommends that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim be denied
without prejudice. No written objections have been filed. The Court therefore ADOPTS the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as those of the Court.
In light of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that Defendant Alarm Security Group, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure
to State a Claim (Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-930, ECF 12), Defendant Guardian Protection
Services, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-937,
ECF 12), Defendant Interface Security Systems, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a
Claim (Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-938, ECF 12), Defendant Monitronics International, Inc.’s
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-940, ECF 12),
2

Defendant Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a
Claim (Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-941, ECF 12) and Defendant Vector Security, Inc.’s Motion to
Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-944, ECF 12) are DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 1
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of March, 2016.

____________________________________
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

The Report and Recommendation additionally recommended that Defendant Central Security Group – Nationwide,
Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-931, ECF 12) and Defendant CPI
Security Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-932, ECF 12) be
denied without prejudice. After the filing of the Report and Recommendation, the claims against Defendant Central
Security Group – Nationwide, Inc. and CPI Security Systems, Inc. were dismissed with prejudice.
3