Fenton v. Baker et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Report and Recommendation 16 is ADOPTED. The civil rights complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. All motions by either party not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 04/06/15. (mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARK EDWARD FENTON, #859072
EDGAR D. BAKER, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14cv995
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff Mark Edward Fenton, an inmate confined at the Michael Unit of the Texas prison
system, filed the above-styled and numbered civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The
complaint was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and
Recommendation concluding that the complaint should be dismissed. The Plaintiff has filed
response (docket entry #19), which is construed as objections.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and
recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and having
made a de novo review of the objections raised by the Plaintiff, the Court is of the opinion that the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections by the Plaintiff are
without merit. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate
Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (docket entry #16) is ADOPTED. It is
ORDERED that the civil rights complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915A. It is finally
ORDERED that all motions by either party not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 6th day of April, 2015.
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?