Garcia v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The decision of the Commissioner is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 07/23/15. (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION DEBORAH KAY GARCIA § v. § COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14cv998 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Deborah Kay Garcia filed the above-styled and numbered civil action pursuant to the Social Security Act, Section 205(g), for judicial review of the Commissioners’s denial of her application for Social Security benefits. The cause of action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the case should be remanded pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) based on the Commissioner’s own motion to remand. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Neither party has filed any objections. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly 1 . ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Commissioner’s motion and the findings herein, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). It is further ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. It is SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 23rd day of July, 2015. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?