Garcia v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The decision of the Commissioner is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 07/23/15. (mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
DEBORAH KAY GARCIA
§
v.
§
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14cv998
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff Deborah Kay Garcia filed the above-styled and numbered civil action pursuant to
the Social Security Act, Section 205(g), for judicial review of the Commissioners’s denial of her
application for Social Security benefits. The cause of action was referred to United States Magistrate
Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the case should be
remanded pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) based on the Commissioner’s own
motion to remand.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and
recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Neither
party has filed any objections. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
1
.
ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REMANDED to the Commissioner
for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Commissioner’s motion and the findings
herein, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). It is further ORDERED that any
motion not previously ruled on is DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 23rd day of July, 2015.
____________________________________
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?