Conrad v. Krc et al

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendants' Motion to Stay Case 8 is GRANTED. The case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending resolution of Plaintiff's criminal case. Plaintiff may seek to have the case placed back on the active docket by filing notice that the criminal charge has been resolved. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 04/14/15. (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION DERRICK CONRAD v. WAYNE KRC, et al. § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15CV77 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of Defendants’ Motion to Stay Case (docket no. 8) has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation (docket no. 16) recommends that the motion be granted and that the case be administratively closed. Plaintiff filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation on April 7, 2015 and Defendants filed a response to Plaintiff’s objections on April 9, 2015. Having made a de novo review of the written objections filed by Plaintiff and . Defendants’ response thereto, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections are without merit. In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Stay Case (doc. no. 8) is GRANTED. The case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending resolution of Plaintiff’s criminal case. Plaintiff may seek to have the case placed back on the active docket by filing notice that the criminal charge has been resolved. SIGNED this 14th day of April, 2015. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?