Dostol v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Filing
18
ORDER adopting 16 Report and Recommendation. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Ordered that any motion not previously ruled on is denied. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 9/14/16. (tkd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
JO DOSTAL
vs.
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15cv96
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings,
conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this action, has been presented for
consideration.
The Report and Recommendation recommends that the decision of the
Commissioner be affirmed and that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff filed
written objections on June 8, 2016.
Having made a de novo review of the objection filed by Plaintiff, the findings,
conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and Plaintiff’s objection is
without merit.
decision.
There is substantial evidence in the record supporting the Commissioner’s
Plaintiff’s objection merely states a conclusory allegation that the Report and
Recommendation “fail[s] to address the ALJ’s failure to apply the proper legal standards.” The
Report and Recommendation, however, fully considered the ALJ’s decision in light of the
applicable legal standards. The findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are, therefore,
adopted as those of the Court. It is
1
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s objection is OVERRULED.
The decision of the
Commissioner is AFFIRMED and this Social Security action is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. It is further
ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED.
So Ordered and Signed
Sep 14, 2016
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?