Kay v. TELCO CREDIT UNION et al

Filing 29

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 19 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. ORDERED that the Complaint be DISMISSED as to Officer FNU Martinez pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 11/10/2015. (gsg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ROBERT KAY Plaintiff, v. TELCO CREDIT UNION, et al. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Case No. 6:15-cv-462-MHS-KNM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this case has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation (ECF 19), filed on October 5, 2015, recommends that the Complaint be dismissed as to Officer FNU Martinez pursuant to FED. R. 1 CIV. P. 41(b). Neither party filed written objections . Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are adopted as those of the Court. It is ORDERED that the Complaint be DISMISSED as to Officer FNU Martinez pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). 1 On October 13, 2015, Plaintiff filed a document with the Court (ECF 25) purporting to respond to the Court’s Order to Show Cause (ECF 14) as to why the Complaint should not be dismissed as to Officer Martinez. Plaintiff stated, “I do not have in my possession the evidence needed to question OFFICER MARTINEZ without objection of hearsay and I will fail to state a claim for which relief can be granted to OFFICER MARTINEZ. Therefore, OFFICER MARTINEZ is excused from all proceedings, nunc pro tunc, with prejudice.” Doc. No. 25. 1 SIGNED this 10th day of November, 2015. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?