Realtime Data LLC v. Actian Corporation et al

Filing 594

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Riverbed's Motion 436 is DENIED, and specifically DENIED with respect to U.S. Patent No. 7,415,530 and U.S. Patent No. 9,116,908 as set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 556 . Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 05/23/17. (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION REALTIME DATA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ACTIAN CORPORATION ET AL., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15-CV-463 RWS-JDL LEAD CASE JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 556) recommending denial of Riverbed Technology, Inc.’s (“Riverbed”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Docket No. 436) has been presented for consideration. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed during the prescribed objection period. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Riverbed’s Motion (Docket No. 436) is DENIED, and specifically DENIED with respect to U.S. Patent No. 7,415,530 and U.S. Patent No. 9,116,908 as set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 556). Page 1 of 2 SIGNED this 23rd day of May, 2017. ____________________________________ ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?