Johnson v. Medical Dept Michael Unit
Filing
24
ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 20 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for purposes of in forma pauperis proceedings. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 10/21/2015. (gsg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
DIETRICK LEWIS JOHNSON, SR.
#19831-078
VS.
MEDICAL DEPT. MICHAEL UNIT, ET AL.
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15cv477
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The above-styled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate
Judge John D. Love. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains
proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented
for consideration, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that
the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts same as the findings and
conclusions of the Court. It is therefore
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (doc. #20) is ADOPTED. It is further
ORDERED that the Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (doc. #16)
is GRANTED. It is further
ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for purposes of in forma
pauperis proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). It is further
ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is REVOKED. The Plaintiff may
resume his lawsuit if he pays the entire filing fee of $400 within thirty days from the entry of this Order
of Dismissal. It is finally
1
ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 21st day of October, 2015.
____________________________________
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?