Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. ADTRAN, Inc.

Filing 110

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 59 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/10/2015. (gsg)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC., et al,
v.
ADTRAN, INC.

(LEAD CASE)

§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 6:15-cv-618-JRG-JDL

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate
Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On November 18, 2015, the Magistrate Judge
issued his Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 59), recommending that that the
following motions be denied: (6:15-cv-618 (Doc. No. 13); 6:15-cv-619 (Doc. No. 13); 6:15-cv622 (Doc. No. 13); 6:15-cv-627 (Doc. No. 13); 6:15-cv-630 (Doc. No. 14); 6:15-cv-633 (Doc.
Nos. 20, 22); 6:15-cv-634 (Doc. No. 17); 6:15-cv-637 (Doc. No. 17); 6:15-cv-638 (Doc. No. 18);
6:15-cv-639 (Doc. Nos. 23, 24); 6:15-cv-620 (Doc. No. 17); 6:15-cv-643 (Doc. No. 17); 6:15-cv652 (Doc. Nos. 17, 18); 6:15-cv-640 (Doc. No. 14); 6:15-cv-650 (Doc. No. 19); 6:15-cv-653
(Doc. No. 15); 6:15-cv-641 (Doc. No. 13); 6:15-cv-642 (Doc. No. 17)). No objections to the
R&R have been presented for consideration within the prescribed time period for such
objections. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge as the findings of this Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the following motions be DENIED: (6:15-cv-618
(Doc. No. 13); 6:15-cv-619 (Doc. No. 13); 6:15-cv-622 (Doc. No. 13); 6:15-cv-627 (Doc. No.
13); 6:15-cv-630 (Doc. No. 14); 6:15-cv-633 (Doc. Nos. 20, 22); 6:15-cv-634 (Doc. No. 17);

1

6:15-cv-637 (Doc. No. 17); 6:15-cv-638 (Doc. No. 18); 6:15-cv-639 (Doc. Nos. 23, 24); 6:15-cv620 (Doc. No. 17); 6:15-cv-643 (Doc. No. 17); 6:15-cv-652 (Doc. Nos. 17, 18); 6:15-cv-640
(Doc. No. 14); 6:15-cv-650 (Doc. No. 19); 6:15-cv-653 (Doc. No. 15); 6:15-cv-641 (Doc. No.
13); 6:15-cv-642 (Doc. No. 17)). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate these motions in the
referenced member cases.
Given that these matters have been consolidated, for the convenience of the Court and the
parties, Plaintiff shall file a single amended complaint with unmodified allegations as to all
.
Defendants in the lead case within 14 days of the issuance of this Order. Defendants shall then
respond to that Complaint. The Court cautions Defendants to exercise sound discretion in
responding to future pleadings.

The Court does not expect that it will receive numerous

additional piecemeal motions to dismiss where, at this stage, Defendants have not answered or
otherwise responded to several of Plaintiff’s allegations.

SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 10th day of December, 2015.

____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2