Finley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Report and Recommendation 15 is ADOPTED. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 03/03/16. (mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
J. R. FINLEY, JR., #1672311
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15cv783
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Petitioner J. R. Finley, Jr., an inmate confined in the Texas prison system, proceeding pro
se, filed the above-styled and numbered petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 complaining that he has not been released on discretionary mandatory supervision. The
petition was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell, who issued a Report
and Recommendation concluding that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be denied.
Petitioner has filed objections.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her proposed findings of fact and
recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and
having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Petitioner to the Report, the Court is of
the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections
of Petitioner are without merit. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions
of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (docket entry #15) is ADOPTED. It
ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and the case is
DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is finally
ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 3rd day of March, 2016.
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?